logical operations in if-implements Per Bothner (16 Jan 1999 06:02 UTC)
Re: logical operations in if-implements Marc Feeley (24 Mar 1999 04:54 UTC)
SRFI 0 philosophy [WAS: logical operations in if-implements] sperber@xxxxxx (24 Mar 1999 08:33 UTC)
Re: SRFI 0 philosophy [WAS: logical operations in if-implements] Marc Feeley (26 Mar 1999 14:06 UTC)

Re: SRFI 0 philosophy [WAS: logical operations in if-implements] Marc Feeley 26 Mar 1999 14:06 UTC

> So, in conclusion, I don't think leanness and simplicity is
> sacrificed by making SRFI 0 more elaborate.  I think making SRFI 0
> more elaborate is necessary to make it sufficiently useful.

At this point I think we really need more input from others and
particularly implementors.  As I have said before SRFI-0 is at the
heart of the SRFI process so we need to have something that has
widespread acceptance.  My views can be bent if I see that enough
people want a particular form (multiway conditional, support for
"and", "or", "not", etc).

So I send a plea to everyone: if you have a view on this subject now
is the time to voice it.

Marc