lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (27 Nov 2021 18:02 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (27 Nov 2021 21:38 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (27 Nov 2021 23:37 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (28 Nov 2021 00:33 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (28 Nov 2021 00:47 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (28 Nov 2021 14:16 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2021 18:03 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Nov 2021 18:46 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Lassi Kortela (30 Nov 2021 19:06 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Nov 2021 19:42 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2021 20:12 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2021 20:20 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt (01 Dec 2021 00:10 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (01 Dec 2021 00:19 UTC)
Re: lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Oct 2022 01:07 UTC)

lset-adjoin! missing from implementation and index Ricardo G. Herdt 27 Nov 2021 18:02 UTC

Hi all,

I noticed lset-adjoin! is not implemented in SRFI-1's reference
implementation, although it is mentioned in the specification under
"Linear update procedures". It is not mentioned under "Set operations on
lists" though. Was it removed/left out on purpose?

Best regards,

Ricardo