Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions Shiro Kawai (26 Aug 2012 20:58 UTC)
Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions David A. Wheeler (27 Aug 2012 00:45 UTC)
Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions Alan Manuel Gloria (27 Aug 2012 00:54 UTC)
Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions David A. Wheeler (27 Aug 2012 01:06 UTC)
Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions Shiro Kawai (27 Aug 2012 04:28 UTC)
Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions Alan Manuel Gloria (27 Aug 2012 06:14 UTC)

Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions David A. Wheeler 27 Aug 2012 01:06 UTC

> On the other hand, *I* (almkglor) have seen Scheme code that looks like this:
> (let ([x foo][y bar])
>  ...)

Yeccch.

Well, a pretty-printer would solve that in a hurry.  I suspect few pretty-printers would do that by default (and even if they did, I'd expect that to be configurable).

Since R7RS doesn't require support for [] as a synonym for (), if they update for R7RS, maybe they'd be willing to fix that.

--- David A. Wheeler