Re: finishing SRFI-107 - representation of namespace declarations John Cowan (30 Oct 2013 04:46 UTC)

Re: finishing SRFI-107 - representation of namespace declarations John Cowan 30 Oct 2013 04:46 UTC

Per Bothner scripsit:

> XMLName - couldn't find that.

It should have said: for "XML Name" read "XML name", but I see that was
wrong.  So no problem.

> tagname - this is meant to be a syntactic non-terminal
> that has the same role as NCName.  Perhaps just using NCName is the
> cleanest.

+1

Another minor point I noticed:  of the standard Scheme names, only
"space", "newline", and "tab" are actually serializable as XML 1.0;
consequently, things like "&bell;" are not worth having, because
whatever that might mean, it can't mean U+0007.

--
Using RELAX NG compact syntax to        John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>
develop schemas is one of the simple    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
pleasures in life....
        --Jeni Tennison                 <xxxxxx@ccil.org>