syntax changes (srfi-107/108/109) Per Bothner (29 Dec 2012 21:43 UTC)
Re: syntax changes (srfi-107/108/109) John Cowan (30 Dec 2012 03:22 UTC)
Re: syntax changes (srfi-107/108/109) John Cowan (30 Dec 2012 03:37 UTC)
Re: syntax changes (srfi-107/108/109) Per Bothner (30 Dec 2012 04:45 UTC)
Re: syntax changes (srfi-107/108/109) John Cowan (31 Dec 2012 07:37 UTC)
Re: syntax changes (srfi-107/108/109) Per Bothner (31 Dec 2012 08:42 UTC)

Re: syntax changes (srfi-107/108/109) John Cowan 30 Dec 2012 03:37 UTC

Scripsi:

> More to the point, the last is code, whereas the first two are
> lexical syntax and therefore work in data.  I think it's important
> to always keep the data applications firmly in mind.

Hmm, it seems I was wrong.  [a b c] complains of undefined variables,
so it really is (vector a b c), whereas #(a b c) is indeed lexical syntax.

--
John Cowan   xxxxxx@ccil.org    http://ccil.org/~cowan
I come from under the hill, and under the hills and over the hills my paths
led. And through the air. I am he that walks unseen.  I am the clue-finder,
the web-cutter, the stinging fly. I was chosen for the lucky number.  --Bilbo