hash-table-set!, etc. Arthur A. Gleckler (08 Sep 2015 06:05 UTC)
Re: hash-table-set!, etc. John Cowan (08 Sep 2015 12:47 UTC)
Re: hash-table-set!, etc. Arthur A. Gleckler (08 Sep 2015 17:18 UTC)
Re: hash-table-set!, etc. John Cowan (14 Sep 2015 02:04 UTC)

Re: hash-table-set!, etc. John Cowan 14 Sep 2015 02:04 UTC

Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:

> Aha!  Yes, text would be better.  Imagine a blind person trying using a
> reader, for example.

Fixed.

> I suppose.  I have a hard time thinking of a case where the as-arguments
> version would be meaningfully better than the as-a-list version.

I've banished -set-entries! and -delete-list!, because their effect can
be achieved with `apply`.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
   There was an old man                Said with a laugh, "I
     From Peru, whose lim'ricks all      Cut them in half, the pay is
       Look'd like haiku.  He              Much better for two."
                                             --Emmet O'Brien