Extending SRFI 130 to subsume SRFI 13 (mostly) John Cowan (26 Dec 2015 18:53 UTC)
Re: Extending SRFI 130 to subsume SRFI 13 (mostly) Alex Shinn (07 Jan 2016 23:40 UTC)
Re: Extending SRFI 130 to subsume SRFI 13 (mostly) John Cowan (07 Jan 2016 23:46 UTC)
Re: Extending SRFI 130 to subsume SRFI 13 (mostly) Alex Shinn (08 Jan 2016 00:15 UTC)

Re: Extending SRFI 130 to subsume SRFI 13 (mostly) John Cowan 07 Jan 2016 23:46 UTC

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> Regardless, foo/whole is redundant with making the arguments
> optional for either version.

Sure.  The idea is to get rid of optional arguments.  Either whole,
or start and end indexes, or start and end cursors.  If you want to
layer an unmarked version of foo on top of any two, you can.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
        Only do what only you can do.
        --Edsger W. Dijkstra's advice to a student in search of a thesis