SRFI 135 vs. SRFI 140 Arthur A. Gleckler (15 Jul 2016 17:49 UTC)
Re: SRFI 135 vs. SRFI 140 William D Clinger (20 Jul 2016 15:45 UTC)
Re: SRFI 135 vs. SRFI 140 John Cowan (20 Jul 2016 17:20 UTC)

Re: SRFI 135 vs. SRFI 140 John Cowan 20 Jul 2016 17:20 UTC

William D Clinger scripsit:

> I voted for SRFI 135.  I understand that to have been a public
> vote.  At this time, with the voting about to close or possibly
> closed already, I don't want to make any further public comment
> on the relative merits of SRFI 135 versus SRFI 140 with respect
> to that WG2 vote.

SRFI 135 passed, as can be seen at <http://tinyurl.com/wg2-red-results>.

>
> I expect to continue to participate in these discussions, and
> may eventually compare the two SRFIs if I think my opinions on
> their merits might add to the discussion or be relevant to some
> future vote.

I hope to hear from you on the subject anyway.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
If I have not seen as far as other giants, it’s because I have been
standing on my head.  --Trond Engen