Re: Thinking about a post-finalization note to SRFI 152

Show/hide message thread

Thinking about a post-finalization note to SRFI 152 John Cowan (23 Feb 2020 17:36 UTC)

Re: Thinking about a post-finalization note to SRFI 152 John Cowan (23 Feb 2020 17:42 UTC)

Re: Thinking about a post-finalization note to SRFI 152 Lassi Kortela (23 Feb 2020 17:46 UTC)

Re: Thinking about a post-finalization note to SRFI 152 John Cowan (23 Feb 2020 17:48 UTC)

Re: Thinking about a post-finalization note to SRFI 152 Lassi Kortela (23 Feb 2020 17:53 UTC)

Re: Thinking about a post-finalization note to SRFI 152 John Cowan (23 Feb 2020 18:17 UTC)

Re: Thinking about a post-finalization note to SRFI 152 Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Feb 2020 18:51 UTC)

Re: Thinking about a post-finalization note to SRFI 152 Lassi Kortela 23 Feb 2020 17:53 UTC

> An implementation is free to do so, of course.  But a change to the
> R7RS-small standard is a much bigger deal.

What about R7RS-large - can it mandate extended-range versions of
R7RS-small procedures?