Several comments shivers@xxxxxx (10 Mar 2001 02:57 UTC)
Re: Several comments Per Bothner (10 Mar 2001 03:48 UTC)
Re: Several comments sperber@xxxxxx (10 Mar 2001 08:50 UTC)
Re: Several comments shivers@xxxxxx (10 Mar 2001 17:23 UTC)
Re: Several comments Martin Gasbichler (11 Mar 2001 14:31 UTC)
Re: Several comments Marc Feeley (20 Mar 2001 16:14 UTC)
Re: Several comments sperber@xxxxxx (20 Mar 2001 16:33 UTC)
Re: Several comments Marc Feeley (20 Mar 2001 17:11 UTC)
Re: Several comments sperber@xxxxxx (22 Mar 2001 08:27 UTC)
Re: Several comments Marc Feeley (22 Mar 2001 13:05 UTC)
Re: Several comments sperber@xxxxxx (22 Mar 2001 13:29 UTC)
Re: Several comments Marc Feeley (22 Mar 2001 15:06 UTC)
Re: Several comments sperber@xxxxxx (22 Mar 2001 15:11 UTC)
Re: Several comments Marc Feeley (22 Mar 2001 15:28 UTC)
Re: Several comments Per Bothner (22 Mar 2001 17:01 UTC)
Re: Several comments Marc Feeley (22 Mar 2001 18:22 UTC)

Re: Several comments sperber@xxxxxx 22 Mar 2001 13:29 UTC

>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Feeley <xxxxxx@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:

Marc> A third alternative, which is my least favorite is to pin down the
Marc> name of the entry point, for example "script-main".  A script would
Marc> look like this

Marc>   #! /bin/sh
Marc>   "exec" "scheme-script" "$0" "$@"
Marc>   (define (script-main arg1 arg2)
Marc>     (write (+ (string->number arg1) (string->number arg2))))

Marc> and "scheme-script" would always invoke "script-main" after loading a
Marc> script.

I can imagine going with that.  Opinions, anyone else?

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla