Naming convention felix (24 Jul 2002 15:47 UTC)
Re: Naming convention sperber@xxxxxx (24 Jul 2002 15:52 UTC)
Re: Naming convention John David Stone (24 Jul 2002 16:13 UTC)
Re: Naming convention Dave Mason (24 Jul 2002 16:25 UTC)
Re: Naming convention felix (24 Jul 2002 18:38 UTC)

Naming convention felix 24 Jul 2002 15:47 UTC

Is there a particular reason why condition types are prefixed with "&"?
I find this rather ugly. One just has to take a look at PLT's
units/signatures to see a how such syntactical conventions can go totally
haywire.

I don't want Scheme code to look like Perl in a couple of years. ;-)

cheers,
felix