|
Comments on SRFI-39
shivers@xxxxxx
(26 Jan 2003 08:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Comments on SRFI-39
Matthew Flatt
(26 Jan 2003 14:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: Comments on SRFI-39
sperber@xxxxxx
(26 Jan 2003 15:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Comments on SRFI-39
Richard Kelsey
(11 Feb 2003 15:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: Comments on SRFI-39
bear
(11 Feb 2003 16:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: Comments on SRFI-39
Richard Kelsey
(11 Feb 2003 16:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: Comments on SRFI-39
Marc Feeley
(13 Feb 2003 01:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Comments on SRFI-39
Richard Kelsey
(13 Feb 2003 02:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: Comments on SRFI-39 sperber@xxxxxx (13 Feb 2003 12:47 UTC)
|
Re: Comments on SRFI-39 sperber@xxxxxx 13 Feb 2003 12:47 UTC
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Feeley <xxxxxx@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes: Marc> Like Olin I think there is nesting. It is not a nesting of control Marc> but rather a nesting of dynamic context. So in code like this Like Richard, I am now thoroughly confused by what you mean by "dynamic context." Do you mean the same thing that SRFI 18 calls "dynamic environment"? Obviously not, because dynamic environments are associated with continuations, and thus they are *exactly* about control. However, SRFI 39 talks *only* about dynamic environments, and associates this nesting property you're talking about with them. Could you please elaborate? -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla