Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen (11 Oct 2017 19:42 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Arthur A. Gleckler (11 Oct 2017 19:46 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen (11 Oct 2017 20:36 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Arthur A. Gleckler (11 Oct 2017 21:33 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen (12 Oct 2017 13:04 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Arthur A. Gleckler (12 Oct 2017 19:07 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen (12 Oct 2017 19:42 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Shiro Kawai (12 Oct 2017 20:40 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Arthur A. Gleckler (12 Oct 2017 23:13 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen (13 Oct 2017 02:09 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen (13 Oct 2017 15:58 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen (13 Oct 2017 16:13 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Marc Feeley (13 Oct 2017 17:50 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen (13 Oct 2017 17:52 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Shiro Kawai (13 Oct 2017 19:54 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? John Cowan (13 Oct 2017 17:34 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen (13 Oct 2017 17:51 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Alex Shinn (14 Oct 2017 13:03 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Arthur A. Gleckler (14 Oct 2017 13:11 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Arthur A. Gleckler (18 Oct 2017 18:20 UTC)
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen (18 Oct 2017 19:11 UTC)

Re: Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen 11 Oct 2017 20:36 UTC

On 11 October 2017 at 15:45, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
> Thank you very much for the bug report.  Would you mind narrowing it down to
> the simplest reproducible case you can?

Maybe this will help:

5> (format "~7,2F" .997554209949891)
*** ERROR IN compose-with-digits, "srfi-48.scm"@86.46 -- (Argument 2)
NUMBER expected
(+ 1 #f)
6> (format "~7,2F" .99755)
*** ERROR IN compose-with-digits, "srfi-48.scm"@86.46 -- (Argument 2)
NUMBER expected
(+ 1 #f)
7> (format "~7,2F" .9975)
*** ERROR IN compose-with-digits, "srfi-48.scm"@86.46 -- (Argument 2)
NUMBER expected
(+ 1 #f)
8> (format "~7,2F" .997)
*** ERROR IN compose-with-digits, "srfi-48.scm"@86.46 -- (Argument 2)
NUMBER expected
(+ 1 #f)
9> (format "~7,2F" .99)
"    .99"
9>