A liitle note on the side felix (23 Jun 2004 23:44 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Bradd W. Szonye (24 Jun 2004 00:14 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Alex Shinn (24 Jun 2004 03:10 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Bradd W. Szonye (24 Jun 2004 03:55 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Jens Axel Søgaard (24 Jun 2004 05:04 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Bradd W. Szonye (24 Jun 2004 05:07 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Felix Winkelmann (24 Jun 2004 05:19 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side campbell@xxxxxx (24 Jun 2004 16:56 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Bradd W. Szonye (24 Jun 2004 18:47 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side campbell@xxxxxx (24 Jun 2004 04:19 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side Alex Shinn (24 Jun 2004 05:07 UTC)
Re: A liitle note on the side campbell@xxxxxx (24 Jun 2004 01:40 UTC)

Re: A liitle note on the side Bradd W. Szonye 24 Jun 2004 05:07 UTC

Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> 5. Implement srfi-55 as a TeachPack, which means that there is no
>    visible REQUIRE in order to use REQUIRE-EXTENSION.

Do Teachpacks work at all with MzScheme? How cumbersome are they to use?
I'd be surprised to see it implemented that way; the vast majority of
SRFIs are implemented as collections, even SRFI 7 (which is annoying). I
don't see why this one would be treated any differently.
--
Bradd W. Szonye
http://www.szonye.com/bradd