| Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 04:36:07 -0800
 | From: "Bradd W. Szonye" <xxxxxx@szonye.com>
 |
 | Aubrey Jaffer wrote:
 | > SRFI-47 is about fixed-size number representations, not about type
 | > declaration.  Here are the defaulting rules from SRFI-47's replacement
 | > (submitted today) ....
 |
 | These rules look reasonable. I'm guessing that SRFI 58 will also use
 | them; is that correct?

I moved all discussion of precision into SRFI-63.  Was that too
radical?