single vs. multi-sexp modules Alex Shinn (13 Jan 2006 08:25 UTC)
Re: single vs. multi-sexp modules Per Bothner (14 Jan 2006 03:01 UTC)
Re: single vs. multi-sexp modules bear (15 Jan 2006 17:25 UTC)
Re: single vs. multi-sexp modules Alex Shinn (16 Jan 2006 02:05 UTC)
Re: single vs. multi-sexp modules Jim Blandy (16 Jan 2006 06:13 UTC)
Re: single vs. multi-sexp modules Tony Garnock-Jones (16 Jan 2006 11:45 UTC)
Re: single vs. multi-sexp modules Alex Shinn (20 Jan 2006 03:08 UTC)

Re: single vs. multi-sexp modules Per Bothner 14 Jan 2006 03:01 UTC

Alex Shinn wrote:
> ... and many more.  Additions and rebuttals welcome.

Finding modules.  How does an implementation or a user resolve
a module name to a module definition?  If there is a single module
per "byte stream", then one can give the module name to the
byte stream (i.e. a file name).  This makes it easy to find a
module given its code.
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/