(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: Proposal to add HTML class attributes to SRFIs to aid machine-parsing Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (06 Mar 2019 10:12 UTC)
Re: Proposal to add HTML class attributes to SRFIs to aid machine-parsing Arthur A. Gleckler (07 Mar 2019 22:18 UTC)

Re: Proposal to add HTML class attributes to SRFIs to aid machine-parsing Arthur A. Gleckler 07 Mar 2019 22:18 UTC

Ciprian Dorin Craciun <xxxxxx@gmail.com> writes:

| You are correct.  I think -- as you've observed -- that the
procedure / syntax "signatures" are too complex to be "marked-up"
in HTML.  (I gave examples in my previous emails where I've
proposed the S-expression based syntax for this.)

Good, that's what I thought.  You were working so hard on
reformatting that I wanted to make sure I didn't miss something.
But now I understand that the document format you seek is in
service of other goals.