New topic: sample implementation licenses John Cowan (15 Mar 2019 20:44 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (15 Mar 2019 21:02 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses John Cowan (15 Mar 2019 21:34 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses Per Bothner (15 Mar 2019 22:31 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses John Cowan (15 Mar 2019 23:16 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (16 Mar 2019 08:32 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses OKUMURA Yuki (16 Mar 2019 14:47 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses Arthur A. Gleckler (16 Mar 2019 18:23 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses elf (17 Mar 2019 02:50 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses John Cowan (17 Mar 2019 05:14 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses elf (17 Mar 2019 05:39 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses elf (17 Mar 2019 05:52 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses elf (17 Mar 2019 05:58 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses John Cowan (17 Mar 2019 23:10 UTC)
Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (18 Mar 2019 06:56 UTC)

Re: New topic: sample implementation licenses Per Bothner 15 Mar 2019 22:31 UTC

On 3/15/19 2:34 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> It's more about being able to integrate the code into a Scheme implementation that is itself BSD vel sim.

Remember, a SRFI need not have a "portable Scheme implementation" or even
a "mostly-portable solution".  It can even be (though "least preferred") an
"outline of how it might be implemented."

So there is no guarantee of "being able to integrate the code into a Scheme implementation"
at all.
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/