volume of discussion Arthur A. Gleckler (01 May 2021 16:50 UTC)
Re: volume of discussion John Cowan (01 May 2021 16:53 UTC)
Re: volume of discussion Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (01 May 2021 16:59 UTC)
Re: volume of discussion Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (01 May 2021 17:10 UTC)
Re: volume of discussion Lassi Kortela (01 May 2021 20:56 UTC)
Re: volume of discussion John Cowan (01 May 2021 21:44 UTC)
Re: volume of discussion Arthur A. Gleckler (01 May 2021 17:04 UTC)
Re: volume of discussion John Cowan (01 May 2021 18:37 UTC)
Re: volume of discussion Arthur A. Gleckler (01 May 2021 20:09 UTC)
Re: volume of discussion Lassi Kortela (01 May 2021 20:47 UTC)

Re: volume of discussion Lassi Kortela 01 May 2021 20:47 UTC

> I think that ship has sailed.  If anything, create xxxxxx@ for
> actual discussions of the SRFI process.  Most of the traffic on
> srfi-discuss is related to SRFIs, after all, directly or indirectly, so
> it's not *fundamentally* off-topic.

IIRC I suggested making such a list a few months back, but it was
decided that having two lists for general discussion around SRFI is too
much.

Agreed that it's hard to separate SRFI discussion from non-SRFI
discussion since SRFI is so deeply tied to all aspects of Scheme, and
since R6RS the separation between the SRFI and RnRS design processes is
intentionally blurry.