SRFI like cut (SRFI-26) but with ordered arguments Jakub T. Jankiewicz (14 Aug 2021 07:30 UTC)
Re: SRFI like cut (SRFI-26) but with ordered arguments Shiro Kawai (14 Aug 2021 08:57 UTC)
Unicode lambda revisited Lassi Kortela (14 Aug 2021 09:45 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Lassi Kortela (14 Aug 2021 09:52 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (15 Aug 2021 06:17 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Peter (15 Aug 2021 17:21 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (15 Aug 2021 17:28 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Vladimir Nikishkin (16 Aug 2021 07:37 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (16 Aug 2021 10:58 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Shiro Kawai (16 Aug 2021 12:09 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Jeronimo Pellegrini (16 Aug 2021 12:54 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (16 Aug 2021 13:38 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Jeronimo Pellegrini (16 Aug 2021 14:58 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Jakub T. Jankiewicz (16 Aug 2021 19:11 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited John Cowan (16 Aug 2021 15:49 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (16 Aug 2021 19:56 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Shiro Kawai (16 Aug 2021 23:26 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited John Cowan (17 Aug 2021 03:40 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Shiro Kawai (17 Aug 2021 04:15 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited John Cowan (17 Aug 2021 15:04 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Aug 2021 15:34 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited John Cowan (17 Aug 2021 19:00 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Aug 2021 19:22 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Shiro Kawai (17 Aug 2021 20:40 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Aug 2021 20:49 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited John Cowan (18 Aug 2021 23:13 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (19 Aug 2021 16:03 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Daphne Preston-Kendal (19 Aug 2021 16:19 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (19 Aug 2021 16:49 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Daphne Preston-Kendal (16 Aug 2021 21:03 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited John Cowan (16 Aug 2021 21:37 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Lassi Kortela (17 Aug 2021 05:04 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Peter (16 Aug 2021 16:58 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Arthur A. Gleckler (16 Aug 2021 17:00 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Lassi Kortela (16 Aug 2021 17:36 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Arthur A. Gleckler (16 Aug 2021 17:56 UTC)
Re: Unicode lambda revisited Vladimir Nikishkin (17 Aug 2021 04:37 UTC)

Re: Unicode lambda revisited Jakub T. Jankiewicz 16 Aug 2021 19:10 UTC

In LIPS macros are first class objects, this may change in the future but
right now you can use.

(define λ lambda)
(define def define)
(def foo (λ (x) (* x x)))

It probably make things totally not compatible with any Scheme but I think
that this makes LIPS very flexible.

(define (foo fn) (fn 10))
(define-macro (bar y) `(+ ,y ,y))
(foo bar)
;; ==> 20

But this behaviour may change in the future when there will be expansion time.
Because right now macros are evaluated at runtime, they are like functions
on steroids.

On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:54:42 -0300
Jeronimo Pellegrini - j_p at aleph0.info (via srfi-discuss list)
<xxxxxx@srfi.schemers.org> wrote:

> Shiro Kawai <xxxxxx@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > But I don't think we need to accelerate the shift by srfi, either.   I
> > expect the shift will happen spontaneously, just like Scheme has adopted
> > the case-sensitive reader, after many existing implementations supported
> > it.
>
> Currently only Guile, Racket and STklos support unicode lambda (and
> Gauche has an ASCII alternative for a quick lambda).
> I just uploaded a survey here:
>
> https://github.com/schemedoc/surveys/blob/master/surveys/UnicodeLambda.md
>
> J.
>

--
Jakub T. Jankiewicz, Web Developer
https://jcubic.pl/me