A quick guide to Scheme implementations
erkin
(03 Feb 2020 22:41 UTC)
|
Re: A quick guide to Scheme implementations
Duy Nguyen
(03 Feb 2020 23:50 UTC)
|
Re: A quick guide to Scheme implementations
Lassi Kortela
(04 Feb 2020 10:49 UTC)
|
Re: A quick guide to Scheme implementations
Erkin Batu Altunbaş
(04 Feb 2020 16:59 UTC)
|
Re: A quick guide to Scheme implementations Amirouche Boubekki (04 Feb 2020 07:53 UTC)
|
Re: A quick guide to Scheme implementations
Göran Weinholt
(04 Feb 2020 08:00 UTC)
|
Re: A quick guide to Scheme implementations
Lassi Kortela
(04 Feb 2020 11:31 UTC)
|
Re: A quick guide to Scheme implementations
erkin
(04 Feb 2020 16:51 UTC)
|
Re: A quick guide to Scheme implementations
Lassi Kortela
(04 Feb 2020 17:01 UTC)
|
Re: A quick guide to Scheme implementations
Erkin Batu Altunbaş
(04 Feb 2020 21:43 UTC)
|
Re: A quick guide to Scheme implementations Amirouche Boubekki 04 Feb 2020 07:53 UTC
Welcome erkin! Le lun. 3 févr. 2020 à 23:41, erkin <xxxxxx@erkin.party> a écrit : > > Hello everyone (again), > > Last year, I was working on an article called 'An Opinionated Guide to Scheme > Implementations' in order to address the newbie question of 'What implementation > should I start with?' Amirouche asked me to share the draft here, but I > completely forgot about the whole thing. > > Today he helpfully reminded me again and I feel obliged to share the half-baked > draft. It's fairly short and in plaintext but I decided not to clutter your > mailboxes so I'm uploading it to a pastebin service. > > https://clbin.com/ztikI > > Again, I welcome any feedback. Since I'm not well-versed with the majority of > Scheme implementations, I'd like to turn this into a collaborative effort and > draw input from people who actually know how they work. I can share the org file > if needed. > I am always happy to see more Scheme. I like the idea of comparing Scheme implementations. Toward that goal I tasked myself to create a comparator in the spirit of ES6 compatibility table [0] with the usability of caniuse [1]. I started a prototype using chibi-scheme compiled to wasm. I lost momentum because a) working alone is difficult b) it will not pay the bills c) I do not want to emscripten, I will prefer to directly target JavaScript or WASM. [0] https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/ [1] https://caniuse.com/#search=websocket As of today, there is not R7RS that targets JavaScript or WASM: - schism: is R6RS and last time I checked it did not allow interop with JavaScript and did not support call/cc. - Gambit targets JavaScript but it is still a work-in-progress. For instance this bug [2]. [2] https://github.com/gambit/gambit/issues/458#issuecomment-569419700 To summarize, a quick guide to Scheme implementations is fine, with the help of a comparator will be best... If you are interested, I can bring back online the comparator that I started with chibi-scheme. Spoiler: it relies on SRFI-168.