New attempt at a Scheme library
erkin
(03 Feb 2020 22:22 UTC)
|
Re: New attempt at a Scheme library
Amirouche Boubekki
(04 Feb 2020 08:01 UTC)
|
Scheme bibliography / Readscheme updates
Lassi Kortela
(04 Feb 2020 11:17 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme bibliography / Readscheme updates
Amirouche Boubekki
(06 Feb 2020 08:56 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme bibliography / Readscheme updates Lassi Kortela (07 Feb 2020 15:37 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme bibliography / Readscheme updates
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Feb 2020 16:10 UTC)
|
Re: New attempt at a Scheme library
Lassi Kortela
(04 Feb 2020 11:12 UTC)
|
Re: New attempt at a Scheme library
erkin
(04 Feb 2020 16:40 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme bibliography / Readscheme updates Lassi Kortela 07 Feb 2020 15:37 UTC
> I was thinking about making one markdown file per publication. Or we > could go the S-expression route. In any case, it will require to > rework what is currently available, and that is a long process. It can be done bit by bit if we agree on what format we should use. The S-expression could have the same fields as BibTeX, so it's trivial to generate BibTeX files from them as needed. Meanwhile, the S-exprs are trivial to parse in Scheme and turn into JSON etc. > If we come up with an s-expr format, it will be nice to have fields > for keywords and abstracts. Good point. Let's do that.