> I was thinking about making one markdown file per publication.  Or we
> could go the S-expression route.  In any case, it will require to
> rework what is currently available, and that is a long process.

It can be done bit by bit if we agree on what format we should use.

The S-expression could have the same fields as BibTeX, so it's trivial
to generate BibTeX files from them as needed. Meanwhile, the S-exprs are
trivial to parse in Scheme and turn into JSON etc.

> If we come up with an s-expr format, it will be nice to have fields
> for keywords and abstracts.

Good point. Let's do that.