> On 3 May 2020 19:25 Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
> Is it possible that some SRFI x Scheme implementation entries are missing because the SRFI is portable and so implementers don't need to incorporate its code into their own source code? It would be nice to know which Schemes can trivially support particular SRFIs just by loading their sample implementation.

There is indeed work to be done with SRFIs that don't come bundled
with the respective implementations. We need a way to include
implementations that delegate away the responsibility of implementing
SRFIs to third-party packages (eg Chez w/ Thunderchez) as well as
implementations that solely depend on portable reference implementations
of SRFIs (eg TinyScheme).

~erkin