> On 29 April 2020 20:28 Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote:
>
> It would be fun if the SRFI collection could eventually be split into
> zones based on how commonly a SRFI is implemented. This would indicate
> how safe it is to use in portable code.

It might also be a good idea to map out parts that correspond to
auto-withdrawn R6RS drafts and the new influx of R7RS-Large
submissions.

~erkin