LOL I wasn't going to actually propose it. 

In any case, the creators of Snap! seem to have a different opinion:
(Page 4 of the Snap! manual https://snap.berkeley.edu/snap/help/SnapManual.pdf) 

I'm inclined to agree with them.

As I wrote earlier: 

I hope we don’t exclude any Scheme implementations because they don’t fit our personal definition of Scheme. 

Scheme is a living (and evolving) language with a passionate community in addition to implementation communities. Let’s not exclude any.

If we restrict ourselves to RnRS we are poorer for it. 

Best regards 

Stephen

PS Check out page 105.
----