> One way to defend ourselves from piling feature upon feature here could
> be to, at least for now, limit our scope to minimise novelty: if there's
> an existing Scheme Discourse group we can link to it, and if not,
> somebody can try creating one and we'll link to it, and if it seems
> popular and good we can *then* move it to something.scheme.org?

Since all three of you are opposed to Discourse, let's work on other
stuff first and revisit the topic later if there's still interest?