> It all make perfect sense I think I'm convinced.

Thank you very much for listening to the arguments!

> As for SEO after site is live we can check how scheme.org and other domains
> rank.

Sounds great. You know these tools much better than we do.

> I would try to think to make as small number of sub domains as
> possible as per Occam's Razor.
>
> Maybe start github issue where each comment is different sub domain and there
> are reactions (we can vote on sub domain or down vote to have it).
>
> Unless you know any better idea for voting on sub domains. The comment can
> look like this
>
> 	Domain: foo.scheme.org
>
> 	Rationale: explanation why it's needed.
>
> People will vote. I'm not sure how many people follow the threads and are
> willing to vote.
>
> Also each domain can be separated issue where will be able to comment against
> on in favour of given domain.

That kind of voting is fine with me, but I don't know how many people
are following the work on the domain. So far, people are not joining in
to add stuff to the site; would they vote?

It may also make sense to just add stuff to the site, and let the right
subdomains find themselves. It doesn't take much effort to add/delete
them at this early stage, since the site is not public yet there's no
damage from having the wrong ones at first.