> I personally think that chat.scheme.org will be best for that.

OK, you and Wolfgang both voted for chat.scheme.org so let's go with it.
I think it makes sense, too.

We can make irc.scheme.org an alias if people want it; we already alias
blog.scheme.org -> planet.scheme.org, for example.

> But the main page should be about different chats that are available.
> and logs can have specific path like chat.scheme.org/libera/logs

Agreed.

> But note that on https://community.scheme.org/ there are more channels so
> maybe:
>
> chat.scheme.org/libera/scheme/logs
>
> just in case other channels will want to keep logs.
>
> and chat.scheme.org/libera can have Web IRC for people to join from a website.

That's a good principle.

It's not trivial to figure out good URLs for the channels. Channels
sometimes move between IRC networks, or exist on two networks at once. A
recent example is the move of #scheme and others from Freenode to Libera
Chat. A channel is defined more by the set of people in it, than what
network is hosting it at any given time.

> I don't remember which one I was using before. Quick Search
> shows few projects:https://duckduckgo.com/?q=web+irc&ia=web
>
> KiwiIRC looks nice.

Our page https://community.scheme.org/ currently links to
https://web.libera.chat/ which claims to be Kiwi IRC. Their copy of Kiwi
is modded to say "Try an experimental, light-weight client: Gamja".

We could also offer a choice of several clients.

> I can try to test if I can setup working Web IRC that connect to Libera
> #scheme channel. I can also check if there are any cookies saved. KIwi is
> Open Source so even if there are any tracking for analytics we can remove
> them before it will be put on the server.

Thanks. Would be useful to know what information the different web IRC
clients collect/send.