Mailman objections Lassi Kortela (06 Dec 2023 21:40 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Arthur A. Gleckler (06 Dec 2023 22:03 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Lassi Kortela (09 Dec 2023 21:05 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Arthur A. Gleckler (10 Dec 2023 01:55 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Stephen De Gabrielle (10 Dec 2023 11:42 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections John Cowan (10 Dec 2023 13:11 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Lassi Kortela (10 Dec 2023 13:19 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Arthur A. Gleckler (10 Dec 2023 17:40 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections MSavoritias (10 Dec 2023 17:48 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Arthur A. Gleckler (10 Dec 2023 18:01 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections MSavoritias (10 Dec 2023 18:34 UTC)
Range of services to host under the domain Lassi Kortela (10 Dec 2023 18:02 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Lassi Kortela (10 Dec 2023 13:16 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Vasilij Schneidermann (10 Dec 2023 19:16 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Lassi Kortela (10 Dec 2023 19:29 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Arthur A. Gleckler (15 Dec 2023 03:24 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections John Cowan (15 Dec 2023 04:15 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Arthur A. Gleckler (15 Dec 2023 04:19 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections John Cowan (15 Dec 2023 04:46 UTC)
Re: Mailman objections Arthur A. Gleckler (15 Dec 2023 05:42 UTC)

Re: Mailman objections Vasilij Schneidermann 10 Dec 2023 19:15 UTC
Hello,

> Any objections to installing a copy of Mailman and setting up an
> experimental mailing list? Is it a really bad idea for some reason?

one not so obvious thing is that in the wild, the overwhelming
majority of projects uses mailman2. mailman3 is a complete rewrite with
a different user interface. It's best to treat them as separate
projects when evaluating a solution.

Regarding alternatives that haven't been mentioned yet, Sourcehut does
provide (among other things), a mailing list service [1]_. It should
hopefully be easier to set up than mailman3.

Vasilij

[1]: https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/lists.sr.ht