Planet Scheme and Scheme tutorial
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(29 Mar 2024 16:42 UTC)
|
Re: Planet Scheme and Scheme tutorial
Arthur A. Gleckler
(29 Mar 2024 23:22 UTC)
|
Re: Planet Scheme and Scheme tutorial
Arthur A. Gleckler
(31 Mar 2024 06:51 UTC)
|
Re: Planet Scheme and Scheme tutorial
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(31 Mar 2024 11:36 UTC)
|
Re: Planet Scheme and Scheme tutorial
Arthur A. Gleckler
(31 Mar 2024 15:48 UTC)
|
Re: Planet Scheme and Scheme tutorial
Lassi Kortela
(02 Apr 2024 14:31 UTC)
|
Re: Planet Scheme and Scheme tutorial
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(02 Apr 2024 14:49 UTC)
|
Re: Planet Scheme and Scheme tutorial
Arthur A. Gleckler
(02 Apr 2024 15:15 UTC)
|
Introductory texts
Lassi Kortela
(02 Apr 2024 15:28 UTC)
|
Re: Introductory texts Jakub T. Jankiewicz (02 Apr 2024 16:00 UTC)
|
I like what hackr.io is doing: https://hackr.io/tutorials/learn-scheme Where you can up vote a tutorial. (I've added mine but it's not yet public). Maybe create user generated content with comments about particular introduction or a book. For comments and reactions you can use GitHub discussions on one of the repositories: https://giscus.app/ This is an project that allow to do this. Unless you want something written in Scheme from scratch. It may require a lot of effort. On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:28:21 +0300 Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote: > > Done. > Thanks. > > I had been considering introduction.scheme.org > > <https://introduction.scheme.org/> because I know that Marc Feeley, of > > the Scheme Steering Committee, has been looking for a good > > introduction for the language to put up in a public place, like > > scheme.org <https://scheme.org/>, and our infrastructure is set up to > > use subdomains for things on that page. I still think it would be a > > good idea to have a link to some introduction directly from the home > > page, but I'll leave that up to someone else. > > Good point. Very understandable. > > Unfortunately this runs into the same problem as many aspects of > scheme.org: The Scheme community does not have an authority figure who > would have the natural right to recommend particular texts (or software) > over others. We have to present some kind of consensus, and consensus > can be hard to find in most Lisp communities. > > One possible approach is to collaboratively write a Wikibooks-style > community-driven book, but it's unlikely to be as good as professional > texts and it seems unfair toward the latter not to recommend them. > > Perhaps we should list all the introductory texts with some comments > about each. (E.g. what kind of people have found a text useful in the > past, which standard the text is targeting, etc.) That's the only > practical and fair approach I can think of. -- Jakub T. Jankiewicz, Senior Front-End Developer https://jcubic.pl/me https://lips.js.org https://koduj.org