Unmaintained implementations
Antero Mejr
(13 May 2024 14:25 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 14:39 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 15:17 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 17:46 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Antero Mejr
(13 May 2024 18:05 UTC)
|
Categorizing and describing implementations
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 18:24 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations Jakub T. Jankiewicz (13 May 2024 20:16 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 20:23 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 20:37 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 20:39 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(13 May 2024 21:19 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 21:26 UTC)
|
Containers
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 21:37 UTC)
|
Re: Containers
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 21:41 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
John Cowan
(13 May 2024 21:51 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Stephen De Gabrielle
(14 May 2024 08:23 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(14 May 2024 11:55 UTC)
|
Snap and Lisp
Lassi Kortela
(14 May 2024 12:15 UTC)
|
Re: Snap and Lisp
Stephen De Gabrielle
(14 May 2024 12:45 UTC)
|
Re: Snap and Lisp
Lassi Kortela
(14 May 2024 13:33 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Marc Feeley
(14 May 2024 12:48 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Stephen De Gabrielle
(14 May 2024 13:09 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Marc Feeley
(14 May 2024 13:29 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(14 May 2024 14:03 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Stephen De Gabrielle
(14 May 2024 17:45 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Lassi Kortela
(19 May 2024 13:47 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Antero Mejr
(20 May 2024 14:03 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(20 May 2024 14:24 UTC)
|
Definition of "Scheme"
Lassi Kortela
(14 May 2024 13:21 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(14 May 2024 13:53 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 19:12 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(13 May 2024 20:40 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 20:43 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 20:49 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 20:55 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 21:07 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Antero Mejr
(13 May 2024 21:18 UTC)
|
Metadata files
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 21:34 UTC)
|
Re: Metadata files
Antero Mejr
(13 May 2024 21:41 UTC)
|
On Mon, 13 May 2024 21:23:56 +0300 Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote: > > There is also LIPS, but it doesn't seem to fully support any RnRS yet > > and has no SRFIs. > > Yes, indeed. > > > I'm not sure it would count as an standalone implementation, since it is > > tied-in to the Javascript environment. > > No Scheme implementation is ultimately standalone. The bare-metal PC > schemes (Loko, Dream) and the microcontroller Schemes (Bit, PicBit, > ArmPit, Microscheme) may come closest. Most Schemes depend on C. Kawa > and IronScheme depend on the JVM and the CLR, respectively. IMHO these > are prominent implementations by any reasonable measure. I would include LIPS and BiwaScheme as implementations. LIPS has Bookmark that allow to run Scheme on any website even that it's not full Scheme according to spec (no continuations and TCO). LIPS support SRFI, but they are included in README on GitHub and not on the website. And BiwaScheme is Scheme used in Repl.it (coding playground). So both can be tried directly from Browser without installation (Gambit can also be tried in browser but it's really heavy and you need to download a lot of JavaScript to run). BiwaScheme also lack some features like syntax-rules and continuations don't work 100% correctly (I found a bug some time ago when was investigating how continuations work). But some older implementations that are included also have some limitations. Also note that the code most new users write will works in both (LIPS and BiwaScheme) and they are the easiest to try for non technical people (like new programmers). As far I know it's not easy to install Scheme for newcomers that came from Windows OS, since most require compilation of source code (maybe except Racket). On Linux it's easier since some of them are include in official repositories. Just realized: Maybe it would be good idea to include instruction how to install different Scheme implementations on different systems. Or maybe just those that are easiest to install on different OSes. Something that will help people start with Scheme. -- Jakub T. Jankiewicz, Senior Front-End Developer https://jcubic.pl/me https://lips.js.org https://koduj.org