Unmaintained implementations
Antero Mejr
(13 May 2024 14:25 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 14:39 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 15:17 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 17:46 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Antero Mejr
(13 May 2024 18:05 UTC)
|
Categorizing and describing implementations
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 18:24 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(13 May 2024 20:16 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 20:23 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 20:37 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 20:39 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(13 May 2024 21:19 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 21:26 UTC)
|
Containers
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 21:37 UTC)
|
Re: Containers
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 21:41 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
John Cowan
(13 May 2024 21:51 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Stephen De Gabrielle
(14 May 2024 08:23 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(14 May 2024 11:55 UTC)
|
Snap and Lisp
Lassi Kortela
(14 May 2024 12:15 UTC)
|
Re: Snap and Lisp
Stephen De Gabrielle
(14 May 2024 12:45 UTC)
|
Re: Snap and Lisp
Lassi Kortela
(14 May 2024 13:33 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Marc Feeley
(14 May 2024 12:48 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Stephen De Gabrielle
(14 May 2024 13:09 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Marc Feeley
(14 May 2024 13:29 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(14 May 2024 14:03 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Stephen De Gabrielle
(14 May 2024 17:45 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Lassi Kortela
(19 May 2024 13:47 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Antero Mejr
(20 May 2024 14:03 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(20 May 2024 14:24 UTC)
|
Definition of "Scheme"
Lassi Kortela
(14 May 2024 13:21 UTC)
|
Re: Categorizing and describing implementations
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(14 May 2024 13:53 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 19:12 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations Jakub T. Jankiewicz (13 May 2024 20:40 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 20:43 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 20:49 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2024 20:55 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 21:07 UTC)
|
Re: Unmaintained implementations
Antero Mejr
(13 May 2024 21:18 UTC)
|
Metadata files
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2024 21:34 UTC)
|
Re: Metadata files
Antero Mejr
(13 May 2024 21:41 UTC)
|
On Mon, 13 May 2024 12:12:10 -0700 "Arthur A. Gleckler" <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:05 AM Antero Mejr <xxxxxx@antr.me> wrote: > > > There is also LIPS, but it doesn't seem to fully support any RnRS yet > > and has no SRFIs. > > > > It is definitely actively maintained. > > As long as it's clear that it doesn't support any RnRS's, I'm not opposed > to including it. It doesn't support continuations, TCO, and libraries, but it support everything else from R5RS and a lot of R7RS (some functions need upgrade to include multiple arguments that were not in R5RS). It should at least be marked as "partial support". I know that TCO is fundamental for Scheme, but the same is syntax-rules that not all implementation have. But if you decide that it should be marked as "not supported" or something similar, I think it would be better than not being included. -- Jakub T. Jankiewicz, Senior Front-End Developer https://jcubic.pl/me https://lips.js.org https://koduj.org