[pre-SRFI] JSON
Amirouche Boubekki
(01 Jan 2020 14:04 UTC)
|
Re: [pre-SRFI] JSON
Amirouche Boubekki
(01 Jan 2020 21:11 UTC)
|
Re: [pre-SRFI] JSON Lassi Kortela (02 Jan 2020 10:46 UTC)
|
Re: [pre-SRFI] JSON
Amirouche Boubekki
(02 Jan 2020 12:07 UTC)
|
Re: [pre-SRFI] JSON
Duy Nguyen
(02 Jan 2020 09:13 UTC)
|
Re: [pre-SRFI] JSON
Lassi Kortela
(02 Jan 2020 10:03 UTC)
|
Re: [pre-SRFI] JSON
Amirouche Boubekki
(02 Jan 2020 12:23 UTC)
|
Re: [pre-SRFI] JSON
Amirouche Boubekki
(02 Jan 2020 22:05 UTC)
|
Re: [pre-SRFI] JSON
Duy Nguyen
(06 Jan 2020 01:20 UTC)
|
Re: [pre-SRFI] JSON Lassi Kortela 02 Jan 2020 10:46 UTC
> [true, false, [42], false] > > Will produce: > > (json-structure array-open) > (json-value #t) > (json-value #f) > (json-structure array-open) > (json-value 42) > (json-structure array-close) > (json-value #f) > (json-structure array-close) Great! This is a very nice API. > The problem that I tried to solve, that is really fun, is to not rely > on the stack to parse any JSON. That allows the following tests to > pass: > > n_structure_100000_opening_arrays.json > > i_structure_500_nested_arrays.json > > The first with a n prefix, will not segfault (or whatever) and the > second just works even if it is unspecified. Thanks for doing thorough work and going through that test suite.