Hello,

The procedure signature of ‘lset=’ mandates at least one *list*
argument.  However, the SRFI includes this example:

    (lset= eq?) => #t

Since the similar procedures ‘list=’ and ‘lset<=’ both accept the
zero-lists case, I think the example is correct and the signature
wrong.  The sample implementation tends to confirm this.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>