Re: srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each
Per Bothner 17 Oct 2013 20:34 UTC
On 10/17/2013 01:25 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
> I see for-each in the reference implementation and test suite.
Aargh. Now I do too, even though I searched through the file
multiple times. Perhaps a combination of a cut-and-paste error
into my local copy and confusion when scanning the web version.
Also note that the PLT version in reference [5] does seem to be
missing ra:for-each, even though it has ra:map:
http://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/dvanhorn/ralist.plt/3/5/main.ss
--
--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/