Re: srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each Per Bothner 17 Oct 2013 20:34 UTC

On 10/17/2013 01:25 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
> I see for-each in the reference implementation and test suite.

Aargh.  Now I do too, even though I searched through the file
multiple times.  Perhaps a combination of a cut-and-paste error
into my local copy and confusion when scanning the web version.

Also note that the PLT version in reference [5] does seem to be
missing ra:for-each, even though it has ra:map:
http://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/dvanhorn/ralist.plt/3/5/main.ss
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/