Re: srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each
Per Bothner 18 Oct 2013 00:51 UTC
A bug-let, I assume: In ra:for-each there is a call to tree-map/n
which should seems like it should be tree-for-each/n.
--
--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/