srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each Per Bothner (17 Oct 2013 20:11 UTC)
Re: srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each David Van Horn (17 Oct 2013 21:05 UTC)
Re: srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each Per Bothner (18 Oct 2013 00:52 UTC)

Re: srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each Per Bothner 18 Oct 2013 00:51 UTC

A bug-let, I assume: In ra:for-each there is a call to tree-map/n
which should seems like it should be tree-for-each/n.
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/