Re: Proposal: conversion functions
Taylor R Campbell 18 Sep 2009 21:18 UTC
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:09:48 -0400
From: David Van Horn <xxxxxx@cs.brandeis.edu>
Here is a proposal for converting between representation of pairs and
lists.
I think the names PAIR->PAIR and LIST->LIST are very confusing. Also,
both directions are necessary. How about using more descriptive, if
more verbose names, such as SEQUENTIAL-LIST->RANDOM-ACCESS-LIST or
LINEAR-LIST->RANDOM-ACCESS-LIST? Also, are the pair-only operations
useful?