Revised draft of SRFI 101 David Van Horn (20 Sep 2009 20:23 UTC)
Re: Revised draft of SRFI 101 Taylor R Campbell (20 Sep 2009 21:16 UTC)
Re: Revised draft of SRFI 101 David Van Horn (20 Sep 2009 22:16 UTC)
Re: Revised draft of SRFI 101 David Van Horn (22 Sep 2009 14:21 UTC)
Re: Revised draft of SRFI 101 Taylor R Campbell (23 Sep 2009 01:26 UTC)

Re: Revised draft of SRFI 101 David Van Horn 20 Sep 2009 22:16 UTC

Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> Could you make the (portable, procedural part of the) reference
> implementation available as a simple Scheme source file that can be
> browsed on the web, outside of a tarball?

All of the files are there, unfortunately you can't get a directory
listing.  Compound that with the double encoding of :101 and you get
some truly ugly URLs, but here is a listing of the files:

http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-101/srfi/%253A101.sls
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-101/srfi/%253A101/random-access-lists.sls
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-101/srfi/%253A101/random-access-lists/tests.sls
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-101/srfi/%253A101/random-access-lists/procedures.sls
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-101/srfi/%253A101/random-access-lists/syntax.ikarus.sls
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-101/srfi/%253A101/random-access-lists/syntax.larceny.sls
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-101/srfi/%253A101/random-access-lists/syntax.mzscheme.sls
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-101/srfi/%253A101/random-access-lists/syntax/ra-datum.sls
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-101/srfi/%253A101/random-access-lists/syntax/fetch.sls

> This nested directory tree nonsense that Ikarus &c. impose wasn't
> worth copying from Java.

I have bad news for you, my friend.

David