leppie wrote:
> Hi
>
> The reference only says (srfi :101).
>
> If we follow how other SRFI's are prepared (like Derrick's, and what I
> think the library SRFI specifies), there should be 2 libraries, eg
>
> (srfi :101)
>
> and
>
> (srfi :101 random-access-lists) ; first name that came to mind.

Thanks for the suggestion -- you'll be glad to know this is exactly what
is already in the document.

http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-101/srfi-101.html#ImplementationRequirements

The reference implementation, as you point out, only provides (srfi
:101), but it's easy enough to define the other needed pieces in terms
of that.

David