Re: upcoming revision, need feedback R. Kent Dybvig (11 Jan 2010 20:52 UTC)
Re: upcoming revision, need feedback Derick Eddington (12 Jan 2010 02:11 UTC)
Re: upcoming revision, need feedback R. Kent Dybvig (12 Jan 2010 03:52 UTC)
Re: upcoming revision, need feedback Thomas Bushnell BSG (12 Jan 2010 04:24 UTC)
Re: upcoming revision, need feedback Derick Eddington (12 Jan 2010 06:18 UTC)
Re: upcoming revision, need feedback Thomas Bushnell BSG (12 Jan 2010 06:27 UTC)
Re: upcoming revision, need feedback Derick Eddington (12 Jan 2010 07:05 UTC)
Re: upcoming revision, need feedback Thomas Bushnell BSG (12 Jan 2010 07:16 UTC)
Re: upcoming revision, need feedback Derick Eddington (12 Jan 2010 09:00 UTC)
Re: upcoming revision, need feedback R. Kent Dybvig (27 Jan 2010 20:58 UTC)
Re: upcoming revision, need feedback Derick Eddington (28 Jan 2010 00:45 UTC)
Re: upcoming revision, need feedback Vitaly Magerya (28 Jan 2010 10:39 UTC)
Re: upcoming revision, need feedback Derick Eddington (28 Jan 2010 17:45 UTC)

Re: upcoming revision, need feedback R. Kent Dybvig 12 Jan 2010 03:52 UTC

> What do you suggest for such a mechanism?  How will the specification of
> the set of encoded characters be updated after SRFI 103 is finalized?
> Perhaps a good, different, way to update the set is by creating a new
> short SRFI which modifies this one by just saying something like "this
> SRFI supersedes SRFI 103 and it is everything SRFI 103 is except the set
> of encoded characters is modified to be ..."?

That seems reasonable.  The important thing for now is to explain where
the current encoding requirements come from and to anticipate that the
encodings are likely to change with the issuance of a SRFI that supersedes
the present one.

Kent