Continuing support for the sls extension Eduardo Cavazos 11 Jan 2010 01:42 UTC
In order to support SRFI 103, an implementation would have to recognize
and honor the 'r6rs-lib' file extension for R6RS libraries. However, the
'sls' extension is a defacto standard. I'm assuming that implementations
could also continue to honor that extension and be compliant with
If the 'sls' extension can continue to be supported while being SRFI-103
compliant, then I'm less opposed to the mandated extension.
What's your view on this?