On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 18:04 -0800, Derick Eddington wrote:

> I think it's clearly better to not restrict library names *and* to have
> portability with Windows (because I think it'll help Scheme adoption),
> via an encoding design which will die when Windows does and which won't
> be used much.

To clarify, what I mean is it won't be seen or dealt with much by
clients of libraries.

--
: Derick
----------------------------------------------------------------