Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions
Alan Manuel Gloria 31 Aug 2012 02:25 UTC
Hello world,
I just now realized that our rule:
{e} -> e
Means that in practice, {} is "just for grouping", the way () in other
languages is used for grouping.
So, nested {} around single forms doesn't change the iconic meaning of
the underlying data structures.
Consider the C:
((a) + (b))
and the Scheme+SRFI-105:
{{a} + {b}} ==> (+ a b)
I'll probably add that to the rationale soon.
Sincerely,
AmkG