Updated SRFI-105
David A. Wheeler
(04 Sep 2012 01:09 UTC)
|
Updated SRFI-105 highlights David A. Wheeler (04 Sep 2012 01:22 UTC)
|
Marker #!srfi-105
David A. Wheeler
(04 Sep 2012 20:24 UTC)
|
srfi-105 and srfi-38
Shiro Kawai
(05 Sep 2012 01:45 UTC)
|
Re: srfi-105 and srfi-38
David A. Wheeler
(05 Sep 2012 02:23 UTC)
|
Re: Updated SRFI-105
Michael Sperber
(04 Sep 2012 19:12 UTC)
|
Updated SRFI-105 (2012-09-08)
David A. Wheeler
(08 Sep 2012 22:45 UTC)
|
Updated SRFI-105 highlights David A. Wheeler 04 Sep 2012 01:22 UTC
Here are highlights of the changes to SRFI-105: * Mandate equal? comparison for simple curly-infix lists, e.g., to handle ",op" as an operator See http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00018.html http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00027.html * More examples, make clear in the abstract that the users are ANYONE who wants infix, both those less familiar and those very familiar with Scheme. http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00014.html http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00015.html * Mandate returning nfx, and drop transform-mixed-infix. http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00018.html * Make it clear that application authors can override/define "nfx". * Handle f(x). I've embedded neoteric-expressions inside curly-infix. http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00000.html http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00001.html This means that {-(x) / y} is allowed, for example. * Drop enable-..., and add marker such as #!srfi-105 or #!c-expr http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00027.html A lengthy rationale was added to discuss this. --- David A. Wheeler