Group Email Manager

login signup
#!curly-infix vs. #!srfi-105 David A. Wheeler (10 Sep 2012 01:09 UTC)
Re: #!curly-infix vs. #!srfi-105 Shiro Kawai (10 Sep 2012 18:29 UTC)
Re: #!curly-infix vs. #!srfi-105 Alan Manuel Gloria (12 Sep 2012 03:38 UTC)
Re: #!curly-infix vs. #!srfi-105 David A. Wheeler (14 Sep 2012 03:26 UTC)
#!curly-infix vs. #!srfi-105 David A. Wheeler 10 Sep 2012 01:09 UTC 
On the guile-devel mailing list I got another input preferring #!curly-infix over #!srfi-105.

Sjoerd van Leent Privé (...svanleent *AT* gmail.com) said:
> I believe it is information versus information. I believe strongly that
a notion of #!curly-infix would be more readable than #!srfi-105. The
latter doesn't explain at all why the file looks drastically different,
whereas a notion of #!curly-infix (or #!sweet-scheme, #!scheme for the
same reason) is more understandable.

Other thoughts?

--- David A. Wheeler