Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions
John Cowan 26 Aug 2012 22:39 UTC
Alan Manuel Gloria scripsit:
> The implementation *must not*, by default, bind the symbol `nfx`
> to a procedure or macro; this symbol is reserved for use by library
> writers and application writers.
That still seems unnecessary to me. In a library-based implementation,
it makes no difference; in a flat namespace, the name can be overridden.
--
As you read this, I don't want you to feel John Cowan
sorry for me, because, I believe everyone xxxxxx@ccil.org
will die someday. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
--From a Nigerian-type scam spam