Re: Are we done? Are other changes needed to maximize adoption? David A. Wheeler 17 Sep 2012 01:17 UTC

Alan Manuel Gloria:
> I notice that SRFI-26 for example has a separate "Design Rationale"
> which comes after the specifications.
> David, maybe we can reorg the spec slightly to add a separate
> "Design Rationale" after the specifications?

Done.  It's an improvement for sure.

Any other proposed changes?  I'll post yet another revision in a bit, but I want to be gentle to the long-suffering SRFI editors :-).

--- David A. Wheeler