Re: Are we done? Are other changes needed to maximize adoption? David A. Wheeler 17 Sep 2012 01:17 UTC
Alan Manuel Gloria: > I notice that SRFI-26 for example has a separate "Design Rationale" > which comes after the specifications. > > David, maybe we can reorg the spec slightly to add a separate > "Design Rationale" after the specifications? Done. It's an improvement for sure. Any other proposed changes? I'll post yet another revision in a bit, but I want to be gentle to the long-suffering SRFI editors :-). --- David A. Wheeler