Re: Are we done? Are other changes needed to maximize adoption? John Cowan 17 Sep 2012 15:29 UTC
Per Bothner scripsit: > Well, if you want to support the infix expressions people are used to, > need to at least support multiple operators: > 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 SRFI-105 supports this as {3 + 4 + 5 + 6}, though {3 + 4 * 5 + 6} is not natively supported (it comes through as (nfx 3 + 4 * 5 + 6), and it's up to the "nfx" macro, if there is one, to say what that means. > And of couple people are used to parenthesis as grouping. For SRFI-105 to fit nicely into Scheme, () has to work the way it works in vanilla Scheme; the same is true with sweet-expressions. -- Where the wombat has walked, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> it will inevitably walk again. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan (even through brick walls!)