Should we drop curly-foo, etc.? David A. Wheeler 27 Sep 2012 21:31 UTC
Re: Should we drop curly-foo, etc.? John Cowan 27 Sep 2012 21:32 UTC

Re: Should we drop curly-foo, etc.? John Cowan 27 Sep 2012 21:32 UTC

David A. Wheeler scripsit:

> Now that we have marker, should we drop the specification's text about
> curly-foo and standard readers?

Yes, I'd say it's not necessary.

--
John Cowan  xxxxxx@ccil.org   http://ccil.org/~cowan
Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy.  Dennett and Bennett are well-known.
Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett.
There is also one Dummett.  By their works shall ye know them.  However, just as
no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly
known by his works.  Indeed, Bummett does not exist.  It is part of the function
of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him.