Re: Please update SRFI-105
Per Bothner 01 Oct 2012 22:38 UTC
On 10/01/2012 03:31 PM, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> Dear SRFI editors:
>
> Would you please post this updated draft SRFI-105 (attached)?
>
> This cleans up the MUSTard (e.g., referencing and carefully using RFC 2119 terminology), as well as using CSS to make it prettier. A few minor typos are corrected as well.
I just glanced at the, but I noticed 4 instances of $bracket-access$.
Should they be $bracket-apply$ ?
I also noticed:
The symbol $bracket-apply$ is somewhat more awkward to type directly,
but this
is actually a good thing; this means it is even more unlikely to be used
unintentionally by user code.
By the same argument: Should nfc be $nfc$ or something longer?
--
--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/