Re: Please update SRFI-105 Per Bothner 01 Oct 2012 22:38 UTC

On 10/01/2012 03:31 PM, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> Dear SRFI editors:
>
> Would you please post this updated draft SRFI-105 (attached)?
>
> This cleans up the MUSTard (e.g., referencing and carefully using RFC 2119 terminology), as well as using CSS to make it prettier.  A few minor typos are corrected as well.

I just glanced at the, but I noticed 4 instances of $bracket-access$.
Should they be $bracket-apply$ ?

I also noticed:
   The symbol $bracket-apply$ is somewhat more awkward to type directly,
but this
   is actually a  good thing; this means it is even more unlikely to be used
   unintentionally by user code.

By the same argument:  Should nfc be $nfc$ or something longer?
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/